Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Sleep Problems


The main problem with our baby right now is sleep deprivation. This started at about ten months of age, maybe a little sooner, and we are still battling it. I thought it started at about the time we traveled to California (which really messed up his schedule) but the fact that he learned to crawl right before the trip might have had something to do with it. I read that once a baby learns a new skill, like crawling or standing or walking, he doesn't sleep as well. And sure enough, after a few months of joyously sleeping through the night, he was up again, sometimes twice, in the middle of the night. So I talked to some friends and got referred to some books. 

The first book was The 90 minute sleep book. What I got from that is that babies are on a 90 minute cycle in which they are alert and sleepy. So if you pay attention to when they wake up, 90 minutes (or 3 hours, or 4 1/2 hours) later they are in their sleepy phase. There is about a 15 minute window in which it is easier to get the child to fall asleep. Other new parents I have talked to have said that the 90 minute method worked for awhile and then it didn't. Part of me thinks this could be because young babies (the first few months) nap more often and so will fall asleep every 90 minutes. Older babies don't need to nap quite as much, so they get sleepy after 2 or 3 sleep schedules. For my 10 month old, it was 4 1/2 hours, or 3 sleep cycles before he was sleepy again. The other thing that makes it difficult, is if the baby is sleeping in their crib, or anywhere but in your arms, it's hard to know the exact moment they woke up, unless they always wake up crying. 

The second thing I took from the book is how to know that your baby is sleep deprived. There are several things, one of which is waking up crying rather than happy. Also, they wake up easier (noise, light affect them), they sleep lighter, they don't nap as long, they fight sleep, etc. Every one of the symptoms mentioned described our baby at 10 months. And so we knew he was sleep deprived. And we knew to try to watch the clock to pay attention to the 90 minute cycles. But although it might be "easier" to get the baby to sleep after 90 minutes, it doesn't mean you will be successful at it, especially if the baby is sleep deprived and has the symptom of fighting sleep!

The second book is Healthy Sleep Habits, Happy Child. Which is a great book title. Other than the fact that it is written for the stay-at-home mom and the busily working father (seriously, what century is this?!) it has some good points. In fact, I read a mother's story in it that sounded exactly like our baby- down to the times he was falling asleep and the method in which we used to get him to sleep. (I have to say though, there were plenty of stories in there with the same BS: "we tried this for three days and it worked!" "After just a few minutes he was asleep!" which I read while listening to my baby cry and cry in the next room after a week of the same trial and no success. Which made me want to punch the people reporting their stories. But punching a book would be stupid.)

The solution, repeated over and over throughout the book, is earlier bed time. We had been putting our son to sleep around 8:30-9:00 and the book says 7:00 is a good bed time. In an effort to get him to get more sleep, I was trying everything I could to get him used to a 4:30 nap. (We shucked the 90 minute crap and decided that sleeping at the same time every day was the key to getting him to sleep easier). Well, this book says he shouldn't be going down for a nap after 3:00 if we are going to give him an earlier bed time. 

Okay! Once again, new plan. No more 90 minute cycles. No more 4:30 naps.
Day 1: he's super fussy, but he will not nap, so no problem! Fast forward an hour and he's sitting in his high chair waiting for his food to be prepared, and he falls asleep. Well, no dinner tonight but at least he's getting an earlier bed time!
Day 2: He falls asleep at 4:15 and he is OUT. Exhausted. Good nap.
Day 3: He falls asleep at 4:30 and sleeps, in his crib, for an hour. So, basically as soon as we change up the schedule, he starts to nap at 4:30? Maybe he's just exhausted because he only sleeps in the morning at the babysitter's.  

Okay! New plan. The book suggests (over and over) to put an 11 month old baby to bed at 7:00 pm, wake them up at 7:00 am, and put them down for naps at 9:00 am and 1:00 pm. It's supposed to work with the baby's biological clock. But it doesn't work for our schedules. So we decided to shift it an hour and have him sleep from 8:00-8:00 (with 1 feeding, hopefully around 6 am) and naps at 10:00 and 2:00. He already naps at 10:00 every day. The 2:00 one will be the difficult one to establish, and he is at the babysitter's at 2:00 for 4 days a week.

No, that plan didn't work either. Seems you can't screw with a baby's biological clock. And babies do have different biological clocks. We found after trying different bedtimes that he falls asleep pretty well around 6:00 every night, and he would sleep through the night if he didn't have a habit of pooping around 4:30-5:00 each morning! Lately, we get up, change the poopy diaper and put him back in the crib where he will sleep until about 5:30-5:45. 

He hasn't been napping as well as we would like him to, but the change in his bed time has allowed him to get at least 11 hours of sleep overnight, and he seems to be much less fussy and less clumsy because of it. My new advice to friends with babies: earlier bed times! Just try it! And expect everyone you know to say "He goes to bed at six? Really?!" (Including the pediatrician)

Sleep problems seem to be common among babies. And once again, like all things baby, there are dozens of books out there with dozens of suggestions, some of them contradicting each other. They say "find out what works best for your baby". What works best is adequate sleep. How do we get there? After three months of exhaustion (baby sleep deprivation=parent sleep deprivation) we are willing to keep trying and experimenting!

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Breaking Balls

We received this Vtech Move & Crawl Ball from a friend, so we did not waste the $14 on it. While it entertained our baby for a few weeks (it rolls on its own!) we found it odd that it says things like "Where's the kitty?" and then you hit the kitty and... nothing. No reward! "Where's the number 3?" Hit number 3, and, nope. Our little one year-old liked to chase it around the kitchen floor and giggle at it. He then picked it up and threw it. And picked it up and dropped it. And dropped it and tossed it some more. And I was thinking how glad I was that we chose to NOT remodel our kitchen floor with real ceramic tile, as much as he was banging the ball around. Even so, he managed to break the thing. Silly me, I thought toys meant for toddlers would be indestructible. Guess it depends on the kid.
He'll be bummed that the ball is gone, but I'll be happy to not hear that damn instrumental toy version of "For he's a jolly good fellow" again!

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Book Review: Where is Baby's Birthday Cake?

by Karen Katz
This book is a fun one to read to babies who are beginning to interact with their books. And it has a plot, unlike many baby books. It could probably be considered a "mystery" since you are trying to find baby's birthday cake throughout the book. The gender-neutral baby is dressed in a very wizard-like outfit and looks to be about one, even though (spoiler alert!) the cake in the end has 4 candles. Baby looks "under mommy's bed". I'm wondering if mommy and daddy are sleeping in separate beds, or if this is written for the single mom, which would be cool. But the last page has both mommy and daddy in it. I guess it could be mommy and boyfriend-of-the month. If so, kudos to Katz for keeping things modern!
While looking for the cake, baby finds ice cream in the refrigerator. I'm not sure why they are keeping the ice cream in the refrigerator. I know I don't keep it there. And it isn't just any old ice cream either, it's fancy triple scooped ice cream of various colors, with cookies and sprinkles and cherries on top! And, baby is eventually going to (spoiler alert!) have a freakin' CAKE too! Yeesh. Behind the wrapping paper, baby finds all his/her party "friends". These are teddy bears. The poor one or four-year-old doesn't have any human babies to help him/her find the cake? And, the poor one or four year-old is going to eat all those ice cream sundaes and cake alone?! When the baby finally (spoiler alert!) finds the cake, baby's parents are behind him/her cheering in happiness. They are practically identical to all of the parents on Southpark, down to the '60s clothing and the no-necks. That part is great, I have to admit.

Book Review: I Love You, Good Night

by John Buller and Susan Schade
This book is a heartwarming book to read to a baby, showcasing the various ways in which we love things. It starts off with "I love you like I love blueberry pancakes". Which is really sweet, but personally, I love chocolate chip pancakes more. And I really love chocolate chip pancakes that also have strawberries and walnuts. And if you really want to go into details, I love the fresh Iowa grown strawberries and not that crap shipped from California. I just don't feel like I should be telling my son that I love him like something that I kinda like but I would love him more if he were different. Maybe that's the foodie in me.
Then the book goes on to say "I love you like vines love trees". This wouldn't bother me except for the illustration of ivy vines wrapped around the trunk of a tree. I lived in Oregon for six years and I saw the ivy sucking the life blood out of the forests. I helped to pull ivy vines out of the woods. The shit is invasive. The environmentalist in me doesn't want to send that message to my son.
"I love you like boots love splashing in puddles": the literalist in me doesn't want my baby to think that inanimate objects feel love. But kids do probably think their stuffed animals love them, so I'll let that one slide.
"I love you like the moon at night: big and round and warm and bright". The scientist in me is going to go ahead and point out that the moon is no tropical island.
In conclusion, this is probably a decent book if you don't dissect it like I did.